9d4888a772
The old implementation was looping through the whole history list, which for SQL was selecting every row in the database. The history benchmark was taking ~2s. If this is rewritten as a specialized SQL query, the benchmark takes ~10ms, an order of magnitude faster than the original non-SQL implementation. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
webengine | ||
webkit | ||
test_adblock.py | ||
test_commands.py | ||
test_pdfjs.py | ||
test_qutescheme.py | ||
test_shared.py | ||
test_signalfilter.py | ||
test_tab.py |