9d4888a772
The old implementation was looping through the whole history list, which for SQL was selecting every row in the database. The history benchmark was taking ~2s. If this is rewritten as a specialized SQL query, the benchmark takes ~10ms, an order of magnitude faster than the original non-SQL implementation. |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| end2end | ||
| helpers | ||
| manual | ||
| unit | ||
| conftest.py | ||
| test_conftest.py | ||