On windows, using '/' in pathnames won't work, so it's impossible to use
to describe a path in a feature spec. The solution is to move the path
logic out of the feature spec and hand it over to `os.path.join` in a
new custom step for userscripts.
For some reason, when comparing the repr in the two processes, we get different
results on OS X and Windows:
- expected: "fünf"
- "f\xfcnf" coming back from the subprocess on OS X
- "fnf" on Windows
Instead we're comparing the json dump now, which should be more predictable.
There are a lot of problems and flakiness with using a real clipboard.
Instead we now have a :debug-set-fake-clipboard command to set a text, and use
logging when getting the contents.
Fixes#1285.
This is a bit tricky since the test will actually run, but be marked as
skipped. The problem is we can't raise a pytest.skip.Exception during a test,
or it'll show up as an exception in a virtual Qt method.
Still this is better than nothing.
- The paste command will now open one tab/window per url if multiple
URLs (separated by newline) are present in the clipboard
- Adds the tests for the new multitab functionality
- Changes test/integration/conftest.py to be able to insert newlines in
the clipboard for the test
- qtbot.waitSignal with raising=True is the default this way, so we remove the
raising=True.
- qtbot.waitSignal with raising=False stay untouched
- Some qtbot.waitSignal without raising had one added (because we don't want it
to raise)
- Some qtbot.waitSignal without raising actually should've raised, which they
do now.
For some reason I can't explain, since 2b0870084b
we got test failures on OS X, as the clipboard had the old value before waiting
for the change, the new (correct) value after waiting for it, but never
actually emitted 'changed'.
We could just re-check the contents after the timeout, but that'd mean we wait
1s for every test where this weird thing happens.
Instead, we poll the clipboard for every 100ms as long as the timeout (1s)
hasn't passed, and return as soon as it has the correct contents.
Checking the requests from the webserver proved problematic, as often there's
some kind of caching going on. Instead, we only check the log, as this is used
for things like :navigate anyways, so if the log says the page got loaded, we
can trust it.
There's still "... should be requested" to check the actual requests.
