The message mock might handle a message during pytest-qt's processEvents
during test setup. If that happens, depending on the fixture order,
pytest-caplog might not be set up first, which is why the
self._caplog.at_level call can fail:
File "c:\projects\qutebrowser\qutebrowser\misc\guiprocess.py", line 105, in on_finished
immediately=True)
File "C:\projects\qutebrowser\tests\helpers\messagemock.py", line 71, in _handle_error
self._handle(Level.error, *args, **kwargs)
File "C:\projects\qutebrowser\tests\helpers\messagemock.py", line 65, in _handle
with self._caplog.at_level(log_level): # needed so we don't fail
File "C:\projects\qutebrowser\.tox\py34\lib\site-packages\pytest_catchlog.py", line 232, in at_level
obj = logger and logging.getLogger(logger) or self.handler
File "C:\projects\qutebrowser\.tox\py34\lib\site-packages\pytest_catchlog.py", line 186, in handler
return self._item.catch_log_handler
AttributeError: 'Function' object has no attribute 'catch_log_handler'
Full stack:
c:\projects\qutebrowser-git\.tox\py34\lib\site-packages\pytestqt\plugin.py(100)pytest_runtest_setup()
-> _process_events()
c:\projects\qutebrowser-git\.tox\py34\lib\site-packages\pytestqt\plugin.py(140)_process_events()
-> app.processEvents()
c:\projects\qutebrowser-git\qutebrowser\misc\guiprocess.py(94)on_error()
-> self._what, msg), immediately=True)
c:\projects\qutebrowser-git\tests\helpers\messagemock.py(71)_handle_error()
-> self._handle(Level.error, *args, **kwargs)
c:\projects\qutebrowser-git\tests\helpers\messagemock.py(65)_handle()
-> with self._caplog.at_level(log_level): # needed so we don't fail
c:\projects\qutebrowser-git\.tox\py34\lib\site-packages\pytest_catchlog.py(235)at_level()
-> obj = logger and logging.getLogger(logger) or self.handler
> c:\projects\qutebrowser-git\.tox\py34\lib\site-packages\pytest_catchlog.py(189)handler()->None
This should fix broken AppVeyor builds.
Fixes#1662.
Using the config_tmdpir fixture across all tests in this module caused
a lingering LineParser to make test_debug fail.
I still don't know why, but scoping the config_tmpdir fixture to only
the test class that was creating ~/.config/qute_test fixes the issue,
and still prevents creation of a user tempdir.
This was more complicated than the other data/config/cachedir test
fixes, as QtWebEngine was accessing the datadir directly (and bypassing
standdarddir.data).
This means the tmpdir_data stub is not enough, we need to set
XDG_DATA_HOME to redirect access.
Don't create ~/.config/qute_test by mocking out standdarddir.config for
all tests in this module.
This adds config_tmpdir to fixtures.py and moves temp_datadir from
test_adblock to fixtures.py as it will be needed more broadly.
Running test_standarddir would pollute the user's home with
`~/.cache/qute_test`.
The `no_cachedir_tag` fixture was supposed to prevent this, but was not
working because [usefixtures does not work on fixtures]
(https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest/issues/1014).
This fixes the fixture to actually prevent cachedir creation, but
applies it to tests individually (or by class) rather than with autouse
because the cachedir tests cannot pass if it is working.
Running the tests would create ~/.config/qute_test and
~/.local/share/qute_test on the user's machine. The test_standardir
module needed a bit more mocking to prevent it from cluttering the
user's machine.
Two tests that created the data dir were fixed by passing basedir in
args, and one test that created the config dir was fixed by patching
os.makedirs to a noop.
In the last CherryPy update, cherrypy.wsgiserver got converted to a
single module. While this issue still exists in pylint, we don't get it
here anymore.
We have some things like pos_px stubbed which will fail any test because
of the stub warning - but some tests don't actually need that, it just
happens when e.g. loading something.
So let's not fail tests based on stub warnings, and see how much works
that way.
Per one of the diff comments on #1597:
> I used to use a tuple for constant things, but nowadays I'd actually
> prefer a list as a tuple is something more heterogeneous (i.e. it
> makes sense to have a `(x, y)` point as a tuple, but a list of points
> would be a list).
> At some point I should probably change it to a list everywhere 😉
