This benchmark was running very quickly due to an improper setup.
The current history implementation expects that a newly inserted entry must
be more recent than any existing entries and sorts according to this
assumption.
The benchmark test inserts increasingly older entries, breaking this invariant.
When run in the benchmark, the qute://history/data implementation would
see an entry older than the oldest time in the time window and would
immediately return with a single "next" entry.
This patch inserts data in an order that mantains history's invariant and adds
a sanity-check at the end of the test. It does not check for the exact length
as not all entries will be within the time window. The length will be some
values <= 100000, the check just ensures that there is at least something more
than a "next" entry.
Before:
---------------------------------------------- benchmark: 1 tests ----------------------------------------------
Name (time in us) Min Max Mean StdDev Median IQR Outliers(*) Rounds Iterations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
test_qute_history_benchmark 9.3050 21.9250 9.6143 0.2454 9.5880 0.1070 230;360 9930 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
After:
-------------------------------------------------- benchmark: 1 tests -------------------------------------------------
Name (time in ms) Min Max Mean StdDev Median IQR Outliers(*) Rounds Iterations
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
test_qute_history_benchmark 220.7040 223.1900 221.7536 1.1070 221.1939 1.8803 1;0 5 1
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before, we just returned the same data for both, but then we'll run into
same-origin restrictions as qute:history and qute:history/data are not the same
host.
Problem 1: Entering a command of `:::save` gives an error.
Problem 2: Entering a command of `:save\n` gives an error.
Both scenarios may seem a bit silly at first, but I encountered both by
copy/pasting a command:
1. Enter `:` in qutebrowser.
2. Copy a full line from a terminal starting with `:`.
3. You will now have both of the above problems.
Solution: Trim all whitespace and `:` of a command. This is also what
Vim does, by the way.
This really tripped me up yesterday, My "Vim default" is to use tabs.
This (where `!···` is a tab) does not work as you'll hope it works:
Scenario: Retrying a failed download when the directory didn't exist (issue 2445)
When I download http://localhost:(port)/data/downloads/download.bin to <path>
And I wait for the error "Download error: No such file or directory: *"
And I make the directory <mkdir>
And I run :download-retry
!···!···And I wait until the download is finished
Then the downloaded file <expected> should exist
Examples:
| path | mkdir | expected |
| asd/zxc/ | asd/zxc | asd/zxc/download.bin |
Unfortunately, pytest-bdd uses the "Python 2 behaviour" of "expand all
tabs to 8 spaces", and doesn't give any errors on strange/inconsistent
whitespace. It can cause very confusing errors.
