The message mock might handle a message during pytest-qt's processEvents
during test setup. If that happens, depending on the fixture order,
pytest-caplog might not be set up first, which is why the
self._caplog.at_level call can fail:
File "c:\projects\qutebrowser\qutebrowser\misc\guiprocess.py", line 105, in on_finished
immediately=True)
File "C:\projects\qutebrowser\tests\helpers\messagemock.py", line 71, in _handle_error
self._handle(Level.error, *args, **kwargs)
File "C:\projects\qutebrowser\tests\helpers\messagemock.py", line 65, in _handle
with self._caplog.at_level(log_level): # needed so we don't fail
File "C:\projects\qutebrowser\.tox\py34\lib\site-packages\pytest_catchlog.py", line 232, in at_level
obj = logger and logging.getLogger(logger) or self.handler
File "C:\projects\qutebrowser\.tox\py34\lib\site-packages\pytest_catchlog.py", line 186, in handler
return self._item.catch_log_handler
AttributeError: 'Function' object has no attribute 'catch_log_handler'
Full stack:
c:\projects\qutebrowser-git\.tox\py34\lib\site-packages\pytestqt\plugin.py(100)pytest_runtest_setup()
-> _process_events()
c:\projects\qutebrowser-git\.tox\py34\lib\site-packages\pytestqt\plugin.py(140)_process_events()
-> app.processEvents()
c:\projects\qutebrowser-git\qutebrowser\misc\guiprocess.py(94)on_error()
-> self._what, msg), immediately=True)
c:\projects\qutebrowser-git\tests\helpers\messagemock.py(71)_handle_error()
-> self._handle(Level.error, *args, **kwargs)
c:\projects\qutebrowser-git\tests\helpers\messagemock.py(65)_handle()
-> with self._caplog.at_level(log_level): # needed so we don't fail
c:\projects\qutebrowser-git\.tox\py34\lib\site-packages\pytest_catchlog.py(235)at_level()
-> obj = logger and logging.getLogger(logger) or self.handler
> c:\projects\qutebrowser-git\.tox\py34\lib\site-packages\pytest_catchlog.py(189)handler()->None
This should fix broken AppVeyor builds.
Fixes#1662.
In the last CherryPy update, cherrypy.wsgiserver got converted to a
single module. While this issue still exists in pylint, we don't get it
here anymore.
We have some things like pos_px stubbed which will fail any test because
of the stub warning - but some tests don't actually need that, it just
happens when e.g. loading something.
So let's not fail tests based on stub warnings, and see how much works
that way.
Per one of the diff comments on #1597:
> I used to use a tuple for constant things, but nowadays I'd actually
> prefer a list as a tuple is something more heterogeneous (i.e. it
> makes sense to have a `(x, y)` point as a tuple, but a list of points
> would be a list).
> At some point I should probably change it to a list everywhere 😉
