- Use the whole home row
- Produce easier chords
- 2-key chords alternate hands first (f[aoeui][dhtns])
- This is indeed a poor patch for easier chords as it should work on
every home-row, but there are not that much homerows around.
This makes it possible to switch to an alternative implementation if
there are weird issues like #1568. Some users might also prefer the
slightly better performance over more accurate hints.
Replace the setting ui.show-keyhints with ui.keyhint-blacklist, which
is a list of globs for keychains that shouldn't be hinted. This allows
users to prevent showing keyhints for keychains they already know.
keyhint-blacklist='*' is equivalent to show-keyhints=False.
Resolves#1515.
From code review:
- escape all strings used in the keyhint html
- read the prefix color each time the hint is shown
- use show/hide instead of setVisible
- clean up pylint/flake8 errors
- use CssColor instead of QssColor for keyhint.fg.suffix
- add some padding to the keyhint popup
When the current keystring is a partial match for one or more bindings,
show the possible bindings in a small overlay.
The overlay is partially transparent by default, but the background
color is configurable as ui->keystring.bg.
Those were added in #443, inspired by luakit.
However, all other bindings follow dwb's defaults, and dwb uses `gt` for
showing buffers. To be consistent, let's rebind gt to show :buffer.
Before, in fonts -> _monospace we preferred Liberation Mono to Courier and
Courier New. Unfortunately, that font looks horrible on Windows if it's
installed, so let's avoid using it if possible.
On Linux, hopefully Courier New/Courier isn't available, and Liberation Mono
will get picked up instead (or one of the other alternatives).
The Shift+Ins key should arguably insert primary selection, not the
clipboard selection as every Qt program does. This commit makes it
possible via the hidden paste-primary command (enabled by default).
Unfortunately QtWebKit does not provide any straightforward way to
insert text at cursor position into editable fields, so we work around
this by executing a JavaScript snippet - inspired by this SO answer:
http://stackoverflow.com/a/11077016
