Hopefully fix FAQ on github
This commit is contained in:
parent
11c4e28769
commit
da79f73185
@ -7,10 +7,9 @@ What is qutebrowser based on?::
|
||||
qutebrowser uses http://www.python.org/[Python], http://qt-project.org/[Qt]
|
||||
and http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/software/pyqt/intro[PyQt].
|
||||
+
|
||||
The concept of it is largely inspired by
|
||||
http://portix.bitbucket.org/dwb/[dwb] and
|
||||
http://www.vimperator.org/vimperator[Vimperator]. Many actions and
|
||||
keybindings are similiar to dwb.
|
||||
The concept of it is largely inspired by http://portix.bitbucket.org/dwb/[dwb]
|
||||
and http://www.vimperator.org/vimperator[Vimperator]. Many actions and
|
||||
keybindings are similiar to dwb.
|
||||
|
||||
Why another browser?::
|
||||
It might be hard to believe, but I didn't find any browser which I was
|
||||
@ -18,8 +17,8 @@ Why another browser?::
|
||||
into writing GUI applications with Python and
|
||||
link:http://qt-project.org/[Qt]/link:http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/software/pyqt/intro[PyQt].
|
||||
+
|
||||
Read the next few questions to find out why I was unhappy with existing
|
||||
software.
|
||||
Read the next few questions to find out why I was unhappy with existing
|
||||
software.
|
||||
|
||||
What's wrong with link:http://portix.bitbucket.org/dwb/[dwb]/link:http://sourceforge.net/projects/vimprobable/[vimprobable]/link:https://mason-larobina.github.io/luakit/[luakit]/link:http://pwmt.org/projects/jumanji/[jumanji]/... (projects based on WebKitGTK)?::
|
||||
Most of them are based on the http://webkitgtk.org/[WebKitGTK+]
|
||||
@ -28,19 +27,17 @@ What's wrong with link:http://portix.bitbucket.org/dwb/[dwb]/link:http://sourcef
|
||||
https://lists.webkit.org/pipermail/webkit-gtk/2014-March/001821.html[deprecated],
|
||||
these bugs are never going to be fixed.
|
||||
+
|
||||
The newer
|
||||
http://webkitgtk.org/reference/webkit2gtk/stable/index.html[WebKit2 API]
|
||||
seems to lack basic features like proxy support, and almost no projects
|
||||
seem to have started porting to WebKit2 (I only know of
|
||||
http://www.uzbl.org/[uzbl]).
|
||||
The newer http://webkitgtk.org/reference/webkit2gtk/stable/index.html[WebKit2
|
||||
API] seems to lack basic features like proxy support, and almost no projects
|
||||
seem to have started porting to WebKit2 (I only know of
|
||||
http://www.uzbl.org/[uzbl]).
|
||||
+
|
||||
qutebrowser uses http://qt-project.org/[Qt] and
|
||||
http://qt-project.org/wiki/QtWebKit[QtWebKit] instead, which suffers from
|
||||
far less such crashes. It might switch to
|
||||
http://qt-project.org/wiki/QtWebEngine[QtWebEngine] in the future, which
|
||||
is based on Google's
|
||||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blink_(layout_engine)[Blink] rendering
|
||||
engine.
|
||||
qutebrowser uses http://qt-project.org/[Qt] and
|
||||
http://qt-project.org/wiki/QtWebKit[QtWebKit] instead, which suffers from far
|
||||
less such crashes. It might switch to
|
||||
http://qt-project.org/wiki/QtWebEngine[QtWebEngine] in the future, which is
|
||||
based on Google's https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blink_(layout_engine)[Blink]
|
||||
rendering engine.
|
||||
|
||||
What's wrong with https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/new/[Firefox] and link:http://5digits.org/pentadactyl/[Pentadactyl]/link:http://www.vimperator.org/vimperator[Vimperator]?::
|
||||
Firefox likes to break compatibility with addons on each upgrade, gets
|
||||
@ -48,7 +45,7 @@ What's wrong with https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/new/[Firefox] and link:h
|
||||
https://blog.mozilla.org/advancingcontent/2014/02/11/publisher-transformation-with-users-at-the-center/[horrible
|
||||
ideas] lately.
|
||||
+
|
||||
Also, developing addons for it is a nightmare.
|
||||
Also, developing addons for it is a nightmare.
|
||||
|
||||
What's wrong with http://www.chromium.org/Home[Chromium] and https://vimium.github.io/[Vimium]?::
|
||||
The Chrome plugin API doesn't seem to allow much freedom for plugin
|
||||
@ -77,16 +74,16 @@ Is there an adblocker?::
|
||||
usage], so implementing it properly might take some time and won't be done
|
||||
for v0.1.
|
||||
+
|
||||
However, there are some alternatives you could use to block ads:
|
||||
However, there are some alternatives you could use to block ads:
|
||||
+
|
||||
* You can use a hosts file to block ads. Examples:
|
||||
http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/[1],
|
||||
http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm[2],
|
||||
http://www.hosts-file.net/[3]
|
||||
* Set up a http://www.privoxy.org/[Privoxy] proxy server and use it to
|
||||
filter ads before they even get to the browser.
|
||||
* Use the https://www.requestpolicy.com/[RequestPolicy] functionality to
|
||||
block ads, which currently isn't implemented either.
|
||||
* You can use a hosts file to block ads. Examples:
|
||||
http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/[1],
|
||||
http://winhelp2002.mvps.org/hosts.htm[2],
|
||||
http://www.hosts-file.net/[3]
|
||||
* Set up a http://www.privoxy.org/[Privoxy] proxy server and use it to
|
||||
filter ads before they even get to the browser.
|
||||
* Use the https://www.requestpolicy.com/[RequestPolicy] functionality to
|
||||
block ads, which currently isn't implemented either.
|
||||
+
|
||||
If you think you can add ad blocking or request policy, please
|
||||
link:doc/HACKING.asciidoc[contribute]!
|
||||
If you think you can add ad blocking or request policy, please
|
||||
link:doc/HACKING.asciidoc[contribute]!
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user