# Exercise 4 ## Kinematic dip PDF derivation Consider a great number of non-interacting particles, each of which with a random momentum $\vec{p}$ with module between 0 and $p_{\text{max}}$ randomly angled with respect to a coordinate system {$\hat{x}$, $\hat{y}$, $\hat{z}$}. Once the polar angle $\theta$ is defined, the momentum vertical and horizontal components of a particle, which will be referred as $\vec{p_v}$ and $\vec{p_h}$ respectively, are the ones shown in @fig:components. If $\theta$ is evenly distributed on the sphere and the same holds for the module $p$, which distribution will the average value of $|p_v|$ follow as a function of $p_h$? \begin{figure} \hypertarget{fig:components}{% \centering \begin{tikzpicture}[font=\scriptsize] % Axes \draw [thick, ->] (5,2) -- (5,8); \draw [thick, ->] (5,2) -- (2,1); \draw [thick, ->] (5,2) -- (8,1); \node at (1.5,0.9) {$x$}; \node at (8.5,0.9) {$y$}; \node at (5,8.4) {$z$}; % Momentum \definecolor{cyclamen}{RGB}{146, 24, 43} \draw [ultra thick, ->, cyclamen] (5,2) -- (3.8,6); \draw [thick, dashed, cyclamen] (3.8,0.8) -- (3.8,6); \draw [thick, dashed, cyclamen] (5,7.2) -- (3.8,6); \draw [ultra thick, ->, pink] (5,2) -- (5,7.2); \draw [ultra thick, ->, pink] (5,2) -- (3.8,0.8); \node at (4.8,1.1) {$\vec{p_h}$}; \node at (5.5,6.6) {$\vec{p_v}$}; \node at (3.3,5.5) {$\vec{p}$}; % Angle \draw [thick, cyclamen] (4.4,4) to [out=80,in=210] (5,5); \node at (4.7,4.2) {$\theta$}; \end{tikzpicture} \caption{Momentum components.}\label{fig:components} } \end{figure} Since the aim is to compute $\langle |p_v| \rangle (p_h)$, the conditional distribution probability of $p_v$ given a fixed value of $p_h = x$ must first be determined. It can be computed as the ratio between the probablity of getting a fixed value of $P_v$ given $x$ over the total probability of $x$: $$ f (P_v | P_h = x) = \frac{f_{P_h , P_v} (x, P_v)} {\int_{\{ P_v \}} d P_v f_{P_h , P_v} (x, P_v)} = \frac{f_{P_h , P_v} (x, P_v)}{I} $$ where $f_{P_h , P_v}$ is the joint pdf of the two variables $P_v$ and $P_h$ and the integral runs over all the possible values of $P_v$ given $P_h$. This joint pdf can simly be computed from the joint pdf of $\theta$ and $p$ with a change of variables. For the pdf of $\theta$ $f_{\theta} (\theta)$, the same considerations done in @sec:3 lead to: $$ f_{\theta} (\theta) = \frac{1}{2} \sin{\theta} \chi_{[0, \pi]} (\theta) $$ whereas, being $p$ evenly distributed: $$ f_p (p) = \chi_{[0, p_{\text{max}}]} (p) $$ where $\chi_{[a, b]} (y)$ is the normalized characteristic function which value is $1/N$ between $a$ and $b$, where $N$ is the normalization term, and 0 elsewhere. Being a couple of independent variables, their joint pdf is simply given by the product of their pdfs: $$ f_{\theta , p} (\theta, p) = f_{\theta} (\theta) f_p (p) = \frac{1}{2} \sin{\theta} \chi_{[0, \pi]} (\theta) \chi_{[0, p_{\text{max}}]} (p) $$ Given the new variables: $$ \begin{cases} P_v = P \cos(\theta) \\ P_h = P \sin(\theta) \end{cases} $$ with $\theta \in [0, \pi]$, the previous ones are written as: $$ \begin{cases} P = \sqrt{P_v^2 + P_h^2} \\ \theta = \text{atan}^{\star} ( P_h/P_v ) := \begin{cases} \text{atan} ( P_h/P_v ) &\incase P_v > 0 \\ \text{atan} ( P_h/P_v ) + \pi &\incase P_v < 0 \end{cases} \end{cases} $$ which can be shown having Jacobian: $$ J = \frac{1}{\sqrt{P_v^2 + P_h^2}} $$ Hence: $$ f_{P_h , P_v} (P_h, P_v) = \frac{1}{2} \sin[ \text{atan}^{\star} ( P_h/P_v )] \chi_{[0, \pi]} (\text{atan}^{\star} ( P_h/P_v )) \cdot \\ \frac{\chi_{[0, p_{\text{max}}]} \left( \sqrt{P_v^2 + P_h^2} \right)} {\sqrt{P_v^2 + P_h^2}} $$ from which, the integral $I$ can now be computed. The edges of the integral are fixed bt the fact that the total momentum can not exceed $P_{\text{max}}$: $$ I = \int \limits_{- \sqrt{P_{\text{max}}^2 - P_h}}^{\sqrt{P_{\text{max}}^2 - P_h}} dP_v \, f_{P_h , P_v} (x, P_v) $$ after a bit of maths, using the identity: $$ \sin[ \text{atan}^{\star} ( P_h/P_v )] = \frac{P_h}{\sqrt{P_h^2 + P_v^2}} $$ and the fact that both the characteristic functions are automatically satisfied within the integral limits, the following result arises: $$ I = 2 \, \text{atan} \left( \sqrt{\frac{P_{\text{max}}^2}{x^2} - 1} \right) $$ from which: $$ f (P_v | P_h = x) = \frac{x}{P_v^2 + x^2} \cdot \frac{1}{2 \, \text{atan} \left( \sqrt{\frac{P_{\text{max}}^2}{x^2} - 1} \right)} $$ Finally, putting all the pieces together, the average value of $|P_v|$ can now be computed: $$ \langle |P_v| \rangle = \int \limits_{- \sqrt{P_{\text{max}}^2 - P_h}}^{\sqrt{P_{\text{max}}^2 - P_h}} f (P_v | P_h = x) = [ \dots ] = x \, \frac{\ln \left( \frac{P_{\text{max}}}{x} \right)} {\text{atan} \left( \sqrt{ \frac{P_{\text{max}}}{x^2} - 1} \right)} $$ Namely: ![Plot of the expected distribution with $P_{\text{max}} = 10$.](images/expected.pdf){#fig:plot} ## Monte Carlo simulation The same distribution should be found by generating and binning points in a proper way. A number of $N = 50'000$ points were generated as a couple of values ($p$, $\theta$), with $p$ evenly distrinuted between 0 and $p_{\text{max}}$ and $\theta$ given by the same procedure described in @sec:3, namely: $$ \theta = \text{acos}(1 - 2x) $$ with $x$ uniformely distributed between 0 and 1. The data binning turned out to be a bit challenging. Once $p$ was sorted and $p_h$ was computed, the bin in which the latter goes in must be found. If $n$ is the number of bins in which the range [0, $p_{\text{max}}$] is willing to be divided into, then the width $w$ of each bin is given by: $$ w = \frac{p_{\text{max}}}{n} $$ and the $j^{th}$ bin in which $p_h$ goes in is: $$ j = \text{floor} \left( \frac{p_h}{w} \right) $$ where 'floor' is the function which gives the upper integer lesser than its argument and the bins are counted starting from zero. Then, a vector in which the $j^{\text{th}}$ entry contains the sum $S_j$ of all the $|p_v|$s relative to each $p_h$ fallen into the $j^{\text{th}}$ bin and the number num$_j$ of entries in the $j^{\text{th}}$ bin was reiteratively updated. At the end, the average value of $|p_v|_j$ was computed as $S_j / \text{num}_j$. For the sake of clarity, for each sorted couple, it works like this: - the couple $[p; \theta]$ is generated; - $p_h$ and $p_v$ are computed; - the $j^{\text{th}}$ bin in which $p_h$ goes in is computed; - num$_j$ is increased by 1; - $S_j$ (which is zero at the beginning of everything) is increased by a factor $|p_v|$. At the end, $\langle |p_h| \rangle_j$ = $\langle |p_h| \rangle (p_h)$ where: $$ p_h = j \cdot w + \frac{w}{2} = w \left( 1 + \frac{1}{2} \right) $$ The following result was obtained: ![Histogram of the obtained distribution.](images/dip.pdf)